• AFLCIO (2002). Executive Paywatch.
  • Anderson, R.E (2005). Wall Street in the Third World? Regulation. Washington: Spring 2005. Vol.28, Iss. 1.
  • Bhagat, S. and Black, B. (1997). Do Independent Directors Matter? Third draft, Columbia Law School.
  • Bhagat, S., and Black, B. (1999). The Uncertain Relationship Between Board Composition and Firm Performance.” Business Lawyer 54. 921-963.
  • Bhagat, S., and Black, B. (2000). Board Independence and Long-Term Firm Performance. Working Paper no. 14.
  • Black, B. Kraakman, R. and Tarassova, A. (2000). Russian Privatization and Corporate Governance: What Went Wrong? Stanford Law Review.
  • Channell, W. (2005). Lesson not Learned Problems with Western Aid for Law Reform in Postcommunist Countries. Carnegie Papers, Rule of Law Series. Democracy and Rule of Law Project Number 57.
  • Dalton, D.R.; Daily, C.M.; Ellstrand, A.E., and Jonathan L. Johnson., J.L. (1998). Meta-Analytic Reviews of Board Composition, Leadership Structure, and Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal 19(3). 269-290.
  • Donaldson, L. and Davis, J.H. (1994). Boards and Company Performance – Research Challenges the Conventional Wisdom. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2:151-160.
  • DTI (2005). Company Law Reform White Paper.
  • Earle, J.S. (1998). Post-Privatization Ownership Structure and Productivity in Russian Industrial Enterprises, Stockholm School of Economics. Central European University. Paper presented at ACES-ASSA meetings.
  • Ernst and Young (2003). Geprijsd & Geprezen, Verslag van een indicatief onderzoek naar de kostenimplicaties van de invoering van de conceptcode van de Commissie Corporate Governance (in Dutch).
  • Fama, E.E (1980), "Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm," Journal of Political Economy, 88, 288-307.
  • FEI (2004). Sarbanes Oxley Cost Estimates, A Survey Among 224 Listed Companies.
  • Gatian, A.W and Gilbert, K.C. (1996). The Central European Need for Management Training and Advisory Services. Multinational Business Review.
  • Gordon, J. N. (1994). Institutions as Relational Investors: A New Look at Cumulative Voting,Columbia Law Review.
  • Gorton, G. and Schmid, F. (2000). Class Struggle Inside the Firm: A Study of German Codetermination. Working Paper 7945, NBER.
  • Griesedieck, J. and Nahas, C. (2005). Winning the Race for Independence in the Boardroom. Korn Ferry International.
  • Hanousek, J.; Ko?enda, E. and Švejnar, J. (2005). Origin and Concentration: Corporate Ownership, Control and Performance. CERGE-EI.
  • IOSCO (2000). Investigating and Prosecuting Market Manipulation. Technical Committee of the International Organization of Securities Commissions.
  • Klein, M.; Capaul, M.; Djankov, S.; and Harford, T. ( 2004). Proving Adam Smith Wrong. International Finance Corporation.
  • La Porta, R.; Lopez-de-Silanesb, F.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishnyc, R. (2000). Investor Protection and Corporate Governance, Journal of Financial Economics.
  • Liang, N and Li., J. (1999). Board Structure and Firm Performance: New Evidence from China’s Private Firms. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Conference, 7-10 August, Chicago.
  • Maassen, G.F. and Brown, D. (2005). General Meetingsof Shareholders, An International Review. In: International Corporate Governance After Sarbanes Oxley, Wiley & Sons.
  • Maassen, G.F., Bosch, F.A.J. van den, and Volberda, H. (2004). The Importance of Disclosure in Corporate Governance Self-regulation Across Europe: A Review of the Winter Report and the EU Action Plan. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 1(2): 146-159.
  • McKinsey & Co. (2002a).
  • McKinsey & Co. (2002b). Global Investor Opinion Survey: Key Findings. New York.
  • Megginson, W.M. and Netter, J.M. (2001). From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization. Journal of Economic Literature 39 (2): pp. 321-389.
  • Mori (1999). We don't trust the boss,' say British Workers.
  • Mori (2003). British Attitudes To The Euro, Company Directors And Working Life.
  • Nam, Sang-Woo and Nam, Il Chong (2004). Corporate governance in Asia. Recent Evidence from Indonesia, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, and Thailand. Asian Development Bank Institute
  • Paredes, T.A. (2005). Corporate Governance and Economic Development. Regulation. Spring 2005. Vol.28, Iss. 1.
  • Peng, M. W. (2004). Outside directors and firm performance during institutional transitions. Strategic Management Journal, 25 (5): 453-471.
  • Peng, M. W., T. Buck, and I. Filatotchev (2003). Do outside directors and new managers help improve firm performance? An exploratory study in Russian privatization. Journal of World Business, 38 (4): 348-360.
  • Pivovarsky, A. (2001). How Does Privatization Work? Ownership Concentration and enterprise Performance in Ukraine. IMF Working Paper.
  • Rechner, P.L. and Dalton, D.R. (1991). CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 12:155-160.
  • Securities and Exchange Commission (2003a). Report Pursuant to Section 704 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  • Securities and Exchange Commission (2003b). Report Pursuant to Section 308(c) of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.
  • Securities and Exchange Commission (2003c). Final Rule: Management's Reports on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic Reports. 17 CFR PARTS 210, 228, 229, 240, 249, 270 and 274.
  • Spencer Stuart (2005a). The Spencer Stuart US Board Index - 20th edition.
  • Spencer Stuart (2005b). The Netherlands Board Index - 8th edition.
  • USAID (2005). Shareholder Rights Awareness Survey. Macedonia Corporate Governance and Company Law Project, Emerging Markets Group.
  • Wall Street Journal Europe (2003). The Wall Street Journal Europe's CEO and Stocks Survey.
  • World Bank (2005a). Judicial Enforcement Assessment, Republic of Macedonia, World Bank, July 2005.
  • World Bank (2005b). Corporate Governance Code Toolkit. Global Corporate Governance Forum.
  • Wright, F. B.(2005). Project to Survey the Use and Effectiveness of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (“the 1986 Act”) as a Legal Sanction Against Directors Convicted of Health and Safety Offences - Interim Report. University of Salford.
  • Zahra, S.A. and Pearce, J.A. II. (1989). Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative Model, Journal of Management, 15:291-334.

Related news items:
Older news items:

You may also be interested in these articles:

PDF Download

Interested in the PDF version of the study? Click here to download.

Maassen, G.F. (2002). An International Comparison of Corporate Governance Models. A Study on the Formal Independence and Convergence of One-Tier and Two-Tier Corporate Boards of Directors in the United States of America, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands.

Maassen, G.F. (2002). An International Comparison of Corporate Governance Models. A Study on the Formal Independence and Convergence of One-Tier and Two-Tier Corporate Boards of Directors in the United States of America, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Spencer Stuart Executive Search.