Automated Directives System (ADS) 303, “Grants and Cooperative Agreements to Non-Governmental Organizations,” requires the agreement officer’s technical representative (AOTR) to monitor and evaluate a recipient’s performance during the award. In addition, it requires USAID to always have some involvement in assistance awards—for example, monitoring performance and reviewing implementer reports.
Moreover, the AOTR’s designation letter [may] outline various oversight responsibilities, including monitoring progress in achieving the objectives of the cooperative agreement and verifying that program-funded activities conform to the terms and conditions of the award.
In addition, ADS 202.3.6, “Monitoring Quality and Timeliness of Key Outputs,” notes that monitoring the quality and timeliness of outputs produced by implementing partners is a major role for AOTRs.
USAID also provides extensive guidance related to data quality. ADS 220.127.116.11, “Data Quality Standards,” identifies five criteria for assessing data quality: validity, integrity, precision, reliability, and timeliness. These criteria can be used as a resource to help missions to ensure the appropriateness of data on which they rely.
Source: AUDIT REPORT NO. 6-263-11-002-P November 10, 2010
This information is derived from audit reports of the Office of the Inspector General. The source refers to the audit report, which is available on this site as part of the Audit Database Project: an educational tool for compliance with USAID regulations. Please see the disclaimer of this site before using this information.
|File Documentation - Procurement Executive Bulletin (PEB 2005-06) Next→|
- File Documentation - Procurement Executive Bulletin (PEB 2005-06)
- Monitoring and Oversight Needs Improvement - ADS 596.3
- Staff Overrode Management Controls - (GAO) Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government - ADS 303.3
- Review and Test Conflict-of-Interest Mitigating Processes - ADS 596 - Standards for Internal Controls in the Federal Government - USAID Contract and Information Bulletin 99-17
- Suspension and Debarment - FAR 9.4 - 22 CFR 208
- Potential Corruption Went Unreported - USAID’s Handbook on Fighting Corruption
- Contractor Lacked a Code of Business Ethics and Conduct - Federal Acquisition Regulation Clause 52.203–13
- Subcontractor Had a Conflict of Interest - FAR Subpart 9.5 Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest - Contract Information Bulletin 99-17