HomeReferencesReferences

References

 

·       Afterman, A.B. (1995). SEC Regulation of Public Companies, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

·       Alchian, A. and Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization, American Economic Review, 62:777-795.

·       Alderfer, C.P. (1986). The Invisible Director on Corporate Boards, Harvard Busi­ness Review, 38-50, November-December.

·       American Bar Association/ABA (1994). Corporate Director’s Guidebook-1994 Edition, The Business Lawyer, 49:1247-1289.

·       American Law Institute (1992), Principles of Corporate Governance, USA.

·       Amsterdam Stock Exchanges – AEX (1998). Monitoring Corporate Governance in Nederland, Bericht van de Monitoring Commissie Corporate Governance en de Uitkomsten van het Onderzoek Verricht door het Economisch Instituut Tilburg (EIT), Verbonden aan de Katholieke Universiteit Brabant(in Dutch).

·       Andreoli, J.J. (1998). On a Key Issue of Corporate Governance: Towards an Assessment of the Quality of Control. Thesis Rotterdam School of Management.

·       Andrews, K.R. (1982). Rigid Rules Will Not Make Good Boards, Harvard Business Review, November-December 34-40.

·       Andrews, K.R. (1986). The Concept of Corporate Strategy, Home­wood, Irwin.

·       Bagley, C.E. and Koppes, R.H. (1997). Leader of the Pack: A Proposal for Disclosure of Board Leadership Structure, San Diego Law Review, 13:149-191.

·       Baker, J.C. (1945). Directors and Their Functions, Harvard University, School of Business Administration.

·       Baliga, B.R., Moyer C. and Rao, R.S. (1996). CEO Duality and Firm Performance: What’s the Fuss?, Strategic Management Journal, 17:41-53.

·       Band, D. (1992). Corporate Governance: Why Agency Theory Is Not Enough, European Management Journal, 10:453-459.

·       Baysinger, B.D. and Butler, H.N. (1984). Revolution Versus Evolution in Corporation Law: The ALI’s Project and the Independent Director, The George Washington Law Review, 52:557-581.

·       Baysinger, B.D. and Butler, H.N. (1985). Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors: Performance Effects of Changes in Board Composition, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 101-124.

·       Baysinger, B.D. and Hoskisson, R.E. (1990). The composition of boards of directors and strategic control: Effects of corporate strategy, Academy of Management Review, 15:72-81.

·       Beasley, M.S. (1994). An Empirical Analysis of the Relation Between Corporate Governance and Management Fraud. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.

·       Beasley, M.S. (1996). An Empirical Analysis of the Relation Between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud, The Accounting Review, 71:443-465.

·       Belcher, A. (1996). The Invention, Innovation and Diffusion of Self-regulation in Corporate Governance, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 3:322-334.

·       Berger, S. (1996). Editorial Introduction. In: Berger S. and Dore, R. (eds.). National Diversity and Global Capitalism, Cornell University Press, New York.

·       Berle, A.A. and Means, G.C. (1991). The Modern Corporation and Private Property (first edition, 1932).

·       Bettis, R.A. and Donaldson, L. (1990). Market discipline and the discipline of management, Academy of Management Review, 15:367-368.

·       Bhagat, S. and Black, B. (1997). Do Independent Directors Matter? Third draft, Columbia Law School.

·       Bilimoria, D. and Piderit, S.K. (1994). Board Committee Membership: Effects of Sex-Based Bias, Academy of Management Journal, 37:1453-1477.

·       Blanco Fernández, J.M.B. (1993). De Raad van Commissarissen bij NV en BV. Doctoral dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands (with English summary).

·       Boal, K.B. and Bryson, J.M. (1987). Representation, Testing and Policy Implications of Planning Processes, Strategic Management Journal, 8: 211-231.

·       Böckli, P. (1996). Corporate Governance: The <<Cadbury Report>> and the Swiss Board Concept of 1991, SWZ/RSDA, 4:149-163.

·       Boeker, W. (1992). Power and Managerial Dismissal: Scapegoating at the Top, Administrative Science Quarterly, 37:400-421.

·       Boeker, W. and Goodstein, J. (1991). Organizational Performance and Adaptation: Effects of Environment and Performance on Changes in Board Composition, Academy of Management Journal, 34:805-826.

·       Boot, A.W.A. (1994). Corporate Governance, Structuurregime en de Financiering van het Bedrijfsleven, Maandblad voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie, 724-736.

·       Boot, A.W.A. (1995). Naar een Dynamischer Structuurregime, De Naamlooze Vennootschap, 280-284.

·       Booth, J.R. (1993). FDIC Improvement Act and Corporate Governance of Commercial Banks, Economic Review, 1:14-22.

·       Bosch, F.A.J. van den (1995). Corporate Communication: Een Strategisch Managementperspectief, In: Handboek Corporate Communication, Part 1.2, 1-39.

·       Bosch, F.A.J. van den (1995). Corporate Governance: Welk Nationaal Systeem is het Beste?, Book review.

·       Bosch, F.A.J. van den (1996). Stakeholders en Management: Een Case-Studie, Holland/Belgium Management Review, 47: 24-31.

·       Bosch, F.A.J. van den and Maljers, F.A. (1994). Strategic Management and Corporate Gover­nance, a Comparative Approach, Project Description Ph.D. Program, ERASM, Erasmus Rotterdam School of Management, Rotterdam.

·       Boyd, B.K. (1990). Corporate Linkages and Organizational Environment: A Test of the Resource Dependence Model, Strategic Management Journal, 11:419-430.

·       Boyd, B.K. (1994). Board Control and CEO Compensation, Strategic Management Journal, 15:335-344.

·       Boyd, B.K. (1995). CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model, Strategic Management Journal, 16:301-312.

·       Braiotta, L. (1994). The Audit Committee Handbook, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

·       Bratton, W.W. (1993). Self-Regulation, Normative Choice, and the Structure of Corporate Fiduciary Law, The George Washington Law Review, 61:1084-1129.

·       Brickley, J.A and James, C.M. (1987). The Takeover Market, Corporate Board Composi­tion, and Ownership Structure: The Case of Banking, Journal of Law & Economics, 30, 161-180.

·       Brickley, J.A., Jarrell, G. and Coles, J.L. (1996). Checks and Balances in the Boardroom?, Chief Executive, June:66-67.

·       Brickley, J.A., Lease, R. and Smith, C. (1994). Corporate Voting: Evidence from Charter Amendment Proposals, Journal of Corporate Finance, 1:5-31.

·       Brodhead, D., Danaher, C., Kritscher, H. and Tadepalli, R. (1996). The Evolution of Corporate Governance, Columbia University.

·       Bull, I and Sharp, F.C. (1989). Advising Clients on Treadway Audit Committee Recommendations, Journal of Accountancy, 2:46-52.

·       Business Roundtable, The (1978). The Role and Composition of the Boards of Directors of the Large Publicly Owned Corporation, The Business Lawyer, 33:2083-2113.

·       Business Roundtable, The (1990). Corporate Governance and American Competitiveness, The Business Lawyer, 33:2083-2113.

·       Business Roundtable, The (1997). Statement on Corporate Governance, A White Paper from The Business Roundtable.

·       Byrd, J. and Hickman, K. (1992). Do Outside Directors Monitor Managers? Evidence From Tender Offer Bids, Journal of Financial Economics, 32:195-221.

·       Cadbury Committee Report (1992). The report of the committee on the financial aspects of corporate Governance, Gee Publishing, London.

·       Cadbury Committee Report (1995). report of the committee on the financial aspects of corporate Governance: Compliance with the Code of Best Practice, Gee Publishing, London.

·       Cadbury, A. (1993). Thoughts on Corporate Governance,Corporate Governance: An International Review, 1:5-10.

·       Cadbury, A. (1995). The Company Chairman, Director Books, Council of the Institute of Directors, England.

·       Chaganti, R.S., Mahajan, V. and Sharma, S., Corporate Board Size, Composition and Corporate Failures in Retailing Industry, Journal of Management Studies, 22:401-417.

·       Chapman, C. (1996). South Africa Initiates Compliance Processes, Internal Auditor, April:6.

·       Charkham, J. (1986). Effective boards, the independent element and the role of the outside director, The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, London.

·       Charkham, J. (1992). Corporate Governance: Lessons from Abroad, European Business Journal, 2:8-16.

·       Charkham, J. (1994). Keeping good company, a study of corporate governance in five countries, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

·       Chester, S. and Rowley QC, J.W. (1996). Chairs and Chief Executive. Why and How the Functions Should be Separated. International Business Lawyer, 279-282.

·       Child, J. (1972). Organization Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice, Sociology, 6:1-22.

·       Clarkson, K.W., Miller, R.L., Jentz, G.A. and Cross, F.B. (1989). West’s Business Law: Text-Cases-Legal Environment, West Publishing Company, Fourth edition, St. Paul, MN.

·       Clements, A. (1995). Cadbury – Owners Must Speak, Financial Times, December 18.

·       Cobb, L.G. (1993). An Investigation Into the Effect of Selected Audit Committee Characteristics on Fraudulent Financial Reporting, Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida.

·       Cochran, P.L. and Wartick, S.L. (1988). Corporate Governance: A Review of the Literature, Financial Executives Research Foundation, Morris­town, New Jersey.

·       Cochran, P.L., Wood, R.A. and Jones, T.B. (1985). The Composition of Boards of Directors and the Incidence of Golden Parachutes, Academy of Management Journal, 28:664-671.

·       Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

·       Conference Board, The (1977). The Board of Directors: Perspectives and Practices in Nine Countries, New York.

·       Conference Board, The (1979). Corporate Directorship Practices: The Audit Committee, New York.

·       Conference Board, The (1981). Corporate Directorship Practices: The Nominating Committee and the Director Selection Process, New York.

·       Conference Board, The (1982). Corporate Directorship Practices: The Compensation Committee, New York.

·       Conference Board, The (1988). The Audit Committee: A Broader Mandate, New York.

·       Conference Board, The (1990). Membership and Organization of Corporate Boards, New York.

·       Conference Board, The (1996). The Corporate Board: A growing Role in Strategic Assessment, A Research Report, New York.

·       Conner, C. (1995). A New Era in Corporate Governance, Canadian Business Review, Autumn:16-20.

·       Conyon, M.J (1994). Corporate Governance Changes in the United Kingdom,Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2:87-99.

·       Conyon, M.J. and Mallin, C.A. (1997). A Review of Compliance with Cadbury, Journal of General Management, 2:24-37.

·       Coulson-Thomas, C. (1992). Strategic Vision or Strategic Con?: Rhetoric or Reali­ty?, Long Range Planning, 25:81-89.

·       Coulson-Thomas, C. (1993). Creating Excellence in the Boardroom, A Guide to Shaping Directional Competence and Board Effectiveness, McGraw-Hill, Lon­don.

·       Dahya, J., Lonie, A.A. and Power, D.M. (1996). The Case for Separating the Roles of Chairman and CEO: An Analysis of Stock Market and Accounting Data, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 4:71-77.

·       Daily, C.M. (1991). Governance Structure and Financial Performance in the Small Company, Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.

·       Daily, C.M. and Dalton, D.R. (1994). Corporate governance and the bankrupt firm: An empirical assessment, Strategic Management Journal, 15:643-654.

·       Daily, C.M. and Dalton, D.R. (1997). CEO and Board Chair Roles Held Jointly or Separately: Much Ado About Nothing, Academy of Management Executive, 11:11-20.

·       Daily, C.M., Johnson, J.L., Ellstrand, A.E. and Dalton, D.R. (1998). Compensation Committee as a Determinant of CEO Compensation, Academy of Management Journal, 2:209-220.

·       Dalton, R.D. and Kesner, I.F. (1987). Composition and CEO Duality in Boards of Directors: An International Perspective, Journal of International Business Studies, Fall: 33-42.

·       Dalton, R.D., Daily, C.M., Ellstrand, A.E. and Johnson, J.L. (1998). Meta-Analytic Reviews of Board Composition, Leadership Structure, and Financial Performance, Strategic Management Journal, 19:269-290.

·       Davis, J.H. (1991). Board leadership roles and shareholder returns: An examination of agency theory, Doctoral dissertation. The University of Iowa.

·       Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D. and Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management, Academy of Management Review, 22:20-47.

·       De Savornin Lohman, H.A. (1996). Duties and Liabilities of Directors and Shareholders under Netherlands Law, Piercing the Corporate Veil, Kluwer Law International, Netherlands.

·       Del Guercio, D. and Hawkins, J. (1997). The Motivation and Impact of Pension Fund Activism, Draft Paper, University of Oregon, Lundquist College of Business, Oregon.

·       Delaware Code, Title 8. Corporations, Chapter 1. General Corporation Law.

·       Deloitte and Touche (1995). Corporate Governance en het Toezicht door de Commissaris. Hoe Houdt de Raad van Commissarissen Greep op het Besturen van de Onderneming? Deloitte and Touche Rotterdam (in Dutch).

·       Demb, A. and Neubauer, F. (1990). How can the board add value, European Management Journal, 8:156-160.

·       Demb, A. and Neubauer, F. (1992a). The corporate board, confronting the paradoxes, Long Range Planning, 25:9-20.

·       Demb, A. and Neubauer, F. (1992b). The corporate board, confronting the paradoxes, Oxford University Press, New York.

·       Dobrzynski, J. (1988). Whose Company Is It, Anyway? Business Week, April 25: 60-61.

·       Donaldson, L. (1990). The Ethereal Hand: Organizational Economics and Management Theory, Academy of Management Review, 15:369-381.

·       Donaldson, L. and Davis, J.H. (1991). Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns, Australian Journal of Management, 16:49-64.

·       Donaldson, L. and Davis, J.H. (1994). Boards and company performance – research challenges the conventional wisdom, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2:151-160.

·       Donaldson, L. and Preston, L.E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications, Academy of Management Review, 20:65-91.

·       Du Plessis, J.J. and Dine, J. (1997). The Fate of the Draft Fifth Directive on Company Law: Accommodation Instead of Harmonisation, Journal of Business Law, 1:23-47.

·       Eisenberg, M.A. (1990). The Duty of Care of Corporate Directors and Officers, University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 51:945-972.

·       Eisenhardt, K.M. (1985). Control: Organization and Economic Approaches, Manage­ment Science, 31:134-149.

·       Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989a). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review, Academy of Management Review, 14:57-74.

·       Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989b). Building Theories From Case Study Research, Academy of Management Review, 14:532-550.

·       Fama, E.F. and Jensen, M.C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control, Journal of Law and Economics, 26:301-325. A reprint is on file with the author that is slightly adapted from the article in the Journal of Law and Economic. This copy uses different page numbers.

·       Finch, V. (1994). Corporate Governance and Cadbury: Self-Regulation and Alternatives, Journal of Business Law, Jan: 51-62.

·       Finkelstein, S. and D’Aveni, R.A. (1994). CEO duality as a double-edged sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command,Academy of Management Journal, 37:1079-1108.

·       Fogelberg, G. (1992). Commercializing the New Zealand Post Office, Long Range Planning, 25:29-36.

·       Fortin, R.J. (1984). Corporate Financial Records and Internal Accounting Controls: What Does the SEC Expect of Audit Committee Members?, N.C.J. INT’L L. & Com. Reg., 9:291-317.

·       Freeman, E.R. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Boston, MA: Pitman.

·       Freeman, E.R. and Reed, D.L. (1983). Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance, California Management Review, Spring: 88-106.

·       Galen, M. (1989). A Seat on the Board is Getting Hotter, Business Week, July 3, 72-73.

·       Gedajlovic, E.R. (1993). A Cross-National Study of Corporate Governance, Strategy and Firm Performance, Doctoral Dissertation, Concordia University Montreal Canada.

·       Gelauff, G.M.M. and den Broeder, C. (1996). Governance of Stakeholder Relationships. The German and Dutch Experience. Research Memorandum, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, The Hague.

·       Gillan, K.J. (1997). CalPERS – Corporate Governance, Planning for the 21st Century, Vital Speeches of the Day, 63:475-478.

·       Glaberson, W. and Powell, W. (1985). A Landmark Ruling That Puts Board Members in Peril, Business Week, March 18:56-57.

·       Glasz, J. R., Arnoldy, H.A., Bos, J.A.M., Dekker, M.W. and Schilder, A. (1997). Praktijkboek Commissarissen, Kluwer, Deventer-the Netherlands.

·       Goddard, D. (1996). Convergence in Corporations Law – Towards a Facilitative Model, Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 26:191-220.

·       Goodstein, J., Gautam, K. and Boeker, W. (1994). The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change, Strategic Management Journal, 15:241-250.

·       Gopinath, C., Siciliano, J.I. and Murray, R.L. (1994). Changing role of the board of directors: in search of a new strategic identity, The Mid-Atlantic Journal of Business, 30:175-185.

·       Grange, W.J., Schwartz, D.E., Gray, W.S. and Woodbury, T.C. (1967). Manual for Corporation Officers, The Law, Procedures, and Forms, The Ronald Press Company, New York.

·       Greenbury Committee Report (1995). Directors’ Remuneration: Report of a Study Group Chaired by Sir Richard Greenbury, Gee Publishing, London.

·       Griffith, V. (1990). Fight for the American Pie, The Banker, April: 17-18.

·       Grinten, W.C.L. van der, Maeijer, J.M.M., Huijben, S.J.H. and Lubbers, A.G. (1973). De Nieuwe Structuur van de Grote N.V. en B.V. Kluwer, Deventer, the Netherlands.

·       Guercio, D. Del and Hawkins, J. (1997). The Motivation and Impact of Pension Fund Activism, second draft, Lundquist College of Business, University of Oregon.

·       Guthrie, J. and Turnbull, S. (1995). Audit committees: Is there a role for corporate senates and/or stakeholders councils?, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 3:78-89.

·       Hall, W. (1995). Cadbury 2 – Who’s Who, Financial Times, November 23.

·       Hampel Committee Report (1998a). Committee on Corporate Governance: Final Report, Gee Publishing Ltd., London.

·       Hampel Committee Report (1998b). Committee on Corporate Governance: The Combined Code, Gee Publishing Ltd., London.

·       Harrison, J.R. (1987). The strategic use of corporate board committees, California Management Review, 30:109-125.

·       Heidrick and Struggles (1987-1989). The Changing Board. New York.

·       Hemmerick, S. (1998). CalPERS Addresses Foreign Proxy Issues, Pensions & Investments, 26:6,141.

·       Herman, E.S. (1981). Corporate Control, Corporate Power. Cambridge University Press, New York.

·       HERMES (1998). Statement on Corporate Governance and Voting Policy, London.

·       Hill, C.W.L. and Jones, T.M. (1992). Stakeholder-Agency Theory, Journal of Management Studies, 29:133-154.

·       Hilmer, F. (1993). The Governance Research Agenda: A Practitioner’s Per­spective, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 1:26-32.

·       Honée, H.J.M.N. (1979). De Benoeming van Commissarissen Bij Grote Vennootschappen. Kluwer, Deventer, the Netherlands (in Dutch).

·       Honée, H.J.M.N. (1996). Commissarissen, Gezanten uit Niemandsland? Rede Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (in Dutch).

·       Honée, H.J.M.N. (1998). Een Wat Versmalde Terugblik Op 25 Jaar Ondernemingsrecht. In: Zilver voor de Gouden Formule, Ontwikkelingen in het Recht tussen 1973 en 1998. Opleidingscentrum voor Recht en Praktijk, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (in Dutch).

·       Horringa, D. (1994). Nederlandse structuurwet in internationaal perspectief, Holland Management Review, 40:12-21 (in Dutch).

·       Hoskisson, R.E. and Turk, T.A. (1990). Corporate Restructuring: Governance and Control Limits of the Internal Capital Market, Academy of Management Review, 15:459-477.

·       Hung, H. (1998). A Typology of the Theories of the Roles of Governing Boards, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 6:101-111.

·       ICA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (1992). www.icaew.co.uk, Jan 1999.

·       ICA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (1995). The future of Britain’s Boards of Directors. Two Tiers or One? London.

·       ICMG, International Capital Markets Group (1995). International Corporate Governance, Who Holds the Reins?, International Bar Association, England.

·       Jenkins, B. (1993). Corporate Governance and the Cadbury Report – A perspective from the Boardroom,Corporate Governance: An International Review, 1:11-13.

·       Jensen, M.C and Meckling W.H. (1976). Theory of the Firm – Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3:305-360.

·       Johannesburg Stock Exchange (1996). The King Report, South Africa.

·       Johnson, R.A., Hoskisson, R.E. and Hitt, M.A. (1993). Board of Director Involvement in Restructuring: The Effects of Board Versus Managerial Con­trols and Characteristics, Strategic Management Journal, 14:33-50.

·       Jonnergård, K. and Svensson, C. (1995). Corporate board behavior: emphasis in role fulfillment – a typology, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 3:65-77.

·       Jonnergård, K., Kärreman, M. and Svensson, C. (1997). Opening up the black box – Lines of reasoning in the work of corporate boards, Institute of Economic Research, Lund University.

·       Judge, W.Q. jr. (1989). Toward a theory of board involvement in the strategic decision process, Doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapter Hill.

·       Judge, W.Q. jr. and Zeithaml, C.P. (1992). Institutional and strategic choice perspectives on board involvement in the strategic decision process, Academy of Management Journal, 35:766-794.

·       Kelley, J. (1996). Greenbury Serves a Corporate Hot Potato, Financial Times, March 21.

·       Kelley, T.P. (1993). The COSO Report: Challenge and Counterchallenge, Journal of Accountancy, 10-18.

·       Kesner, I.F. and Dalton, R.D. (1986). Boards of Directors and the Checks and (Im)Balances of Corporate Governance, Business Horizons, 29:17-24.

·       Kesner, I.F. and Johnson, R.B. (1990). An Investigation of the Relationship Between Board Composition and Stockholder Suits, Strategic Management Journal, 11:327-336.

·       Kester, W.C. (1996). American and Japanese Corporate Governance: Convergence to Best Practice? In: Berger S. and Dore, R. (eds.). National Diversity and Global Capitalism, Cornell University Press, New York.

·       Khademian, A.M. (1992). The SEC and Capital Market Regulation, The Politics of Expertise, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.

·       Knowlton, W. and Millstein, I.M. (1988). Can the Board of Directors Help the American Earn the Immortality It Holds So Dear? In: The U.S. Business Corporation, An Institution in Transition, John R. Meyer and James M. Gustafson (eds.), Ballinger Publishing Company.

·       Koning, C. de (1996). De voorstellen van de Commissie Peters: Ferme Vlag, Milde Lading? De Naamlooze Vennootschap74:305-309 (In Dutch).

·       Korn Ferry International (1996). Board Meeting in Session, European Boards of Directors Study, London.

·       Korn Ferry International (1997). Board Meeting in Session, 24th Annual Board of Directors Study, New York.

·       Kosnik, R.D. (1987). Greenmail: A Study of Board Performance in Corporate Governance, Administrative Science Quarterly, 32:163-185.

·       Kosnik, R.D. (1990). Effects of Board Demography and Directors’ Incentives on Corporate Greenmail Decisions, Academy of Management Journal, 33:129-150.

·       KPMG (1996). Toolkit for the Company Director, Australia.

·       Krayenbuehl, T.E. (1993). Corporate Governance in Banking – A Case for Tighter Regulation?, Long Range Planning, 26:26-35.

·       Kriger, M.P. (1988). The Increasing Role of Subsidiary Boards in MBC’s: An Empirical Study, Strategic Management Journal, 9:347-360.

·       Lammers, C.J. (1989). Organisaties Vergelijkenderwijs. Het Spectrum, Utrecht, the Netherlands (in Dutch).

·       Lewis, W. (1995). Companies Face Wide-ranging Probe Into Board Structures, Financial Times, December 8.

·       Lin, L. (1996). The Effectiveness of Outside Directors As a Corporate Governance Mechanism: Theories and Evidence, Northwestern University Law Review, 90:898-976.

·       Lipton, M. and Lorsch, J. (1992). A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance, The Business Lawyer, 48:59-76.

·       Lo, B.T. (1994). Improving Corporate Governance: Lessons from the European Community, Global Legal Studies Journal, www.law.indiana.edu.

·       Lorsch, J.W. (1995). How do boards draw the line between monitoring performance and managing the company? Empowering the Board, Harvard Business Review, January-February: 107-117.

·       Lorsch, J.W. and MacIver, E. (1989). Pawns or Potentates, The Reality of America’s Corporate Boards, Harvard Business School Press.

·       Maassen, G.F. (1996). The Comparison of Corporate Governance Models, Paper presented at the Scientific Conference on Corporate Governance, Rotterdam: VSB.

·       Maassen, G.F. (1997). Spencer Stuart 1996 Board Index: a Research Project on Corporate Governance Practices in The Netherlands - first edition. Amsterdam: Spencer Stuart Executive Search: Amsterdam.

·       Maassen, G.F. (1998a). Spencer Stuart 1997 Board Index: a Research Project on Corporate Governance Practices in The Netherlands - second edition. Amsterdam: Spencer Stuart Executive Search: Amsterdam.

·       Maassen, G.F. (1998b). De Audit-Commissie van de Raad van Commissarissen in Nederland: Een Internationaal Perspectief, Maandblad voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie, 7/8:410-419 (in Dutch).

·       Maassen, G.F. (1999a). Spencer Stuart 1998 Board Index: a Research Project on Corporate Governance Practices in The Netherlands - third edition. Amsterdam: Spencer Stuart Executive Search: Amsterdam.

·       Maassen, G.F. (1999b). Spencer Stuart 1998 European Board Index: a Research Project on Corporate Governance Practices in Eight European Countries- first edition. Amsterdam: Spencer Stuart Executive Search: Amsterdam.

·       Maassen, G.F. and Bosch, F.A.J. van den (1997a). Comparing Major International Corporate Governance Models: A Convergence of One-tier and Two-tier Board Models? Paper presented at the Academy of Management, Boston.

·       Maassen, G.F. and Bosch, F.A.J. van den (1997b). Een Internationale Vergelijking van Corporate Governance Modellen. Is er Sprake van Convergentie? Bedrijfskunde, Tijdschrift voor modern management, 4:35-41 (in Dutch).

·       Maassen, G.F. and Bosch, F.A.J. van den (1999a). On the Supposed independence of Two-tier Boards: Formal Structure and Reality in the Netherlands, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 1:31-37.

·       Maassen, G.F. and Bosch, F.A.J. van den (1999b). Cadbury in Perspectief: Een Internationale Analyse van Zelfregulering in Corporate Governance, Forthcoming (in Dutch).

·       Maassen, G.F. and Bosch, F.A.J. van den (1999c). Comparing Major International Corporate Governance Models: A Tendency Towards Convergence of One-tier and Two-tier Board Models?, Forthcoming.

·       Maassen, G.F. and van Montfort, J. (1994). Management Buy Out: A Palace Revolution? Amsterdam: Thesis University of Amsterdam (in Dutch).

·       Maassen, G.F. and van Montfort, J. (1996). An Introduction to Organizational Economics: Part I and II, Working paper 13:13 presented at Erasmus University Rotterdam Corporate Governance Project (in Dutch).

·       Mace, M.L. (1971). Directors: Myth and Reality. Harvard University Press. Boston.

·       Maeijer, J.M.M. (1997). Asser-serie 2, deel III. Vertegenwoordiging en rechtspersoon, De naamloze en de besloten vennootschap, Tjeenk Willink (in Dutch).

·       Maeijer, J.M.M., Grinten, W.C.L. van der, Honée, H.J.M.N., Solinge, A.G. van, and Ackermans, G.M.J. (1982). Ondernemingsraad en Vennootschap. Kluwer, Deventer, the Netherlands (in Dutch).

·       Malec, A.M. (1995). Optimal Board Composition in a Corporate Governance Framework: Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, Dissertation Wayne State University.

·       Maljers, F.A. (1992). Inside Unilever: The Evolving Transnational Company, Harvard Business Review, September-October 46-51.

·       Mallette, P. and Fowler, K.L. (1992). Effects of board composition and stock ownership on the adoption of ‘poison pills’, Academy of Management Journal, 35:1010-1035.

·       Malloy, M.P. (1992). Bumper Cases: Themes of Convergence in International Regulation. Fordham Law Review, 60:S1-S22.

·       Manen, J.A. van (1999). Monitor in het Belang van de Vennootschap, een Analyse van de Functie van Commissarissen, Elsevier, the Netherlands (with summary in English).

·       McCarthy, E. (1996). Pension Funds Flex Shareholder Muscle, Pension Management, 16-19.

·       McGregor, D. (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise, New York, McGraw Hill.

·       McMullen, D.A. (1996). Audit Committee Performance: An Investigation of the Consequences Associated with Audit Committees, Auditing, 15:87-103.

·       McMullen, D.A. and Raghunandan, K. (1996). Enhancing Audit Committee Effectiveness, Journal of Accountancy, 79-81.

·       McNulty, T. and Pettigrew, A. (1996). The Contribution, Power and Influence of Part-time Board Members, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 3:160-179.

·       Mills, G. (1989). Who Controls the Board?, Long Range Planning, 22:124-132.

·       Millstein, I.M. (1995). The professional board, The Business Lawyer, November.

·       Millstein, I.M. (1997). Global Corporate Governance- The Next Frontier, Speech delivered at the IRRC Conference on Investor Responsibility in the Global Era, Washington.

·       Millstein, I.M. and Katsh, S.M. (1981). The Limits of Corporate Power, Existing Constraints on the Exercise of Corporate Discretion, Macmillan Publishing Co. inc., New York.

·       Mintzberg, H. (1973). Strategy-Making in Three Modes, California Management Review, Winter 44-53.

·       Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power In and Around organizations, Prentice-Hall.

·       Mintzberg, H. (1984). Who Should Control the Corporation?, California Management Review, 90-115.

·       Moerland, P.W. (1995a). Vennootschappelijke Systemen en Disciplineringsmechanismen in Internationaal Perspectief, Maandblad voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie, 242-252 (in Dutch).

·       Moerland, P.W. (1995b). Alternative Disciplinary Mechanisms in Different Corporate Systems, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 17-34.

·       Moerland, P.W. (1997). Corporate Governance: Schakering, Reikwijdte en Definiëring, Maandblad voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie, 71:657-665 (in Dutch).

·       Monks, R.A.G. and Minow, N. (1995). Corporate Governance, Blackwell Business, Oxford.

·       Mulick, J.J. (1993). Governance Structure, Product-Market Strategy and Performance: A Longitudinal Study of the Banking Industry During Deregulation, Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.

·       Muth, M.M. and Donaldson, L. (1998). Stewardship Theory and Board Structure: A Contingency Approach, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 6:5-28.

·       NACD (1996). Report of the NACD Blue Ribbon Commission on Director Professionalism, USA.

·       NACD/Deloitte and Touche LLP (1995). Corporate Governance Survey, Washington.

·       National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting (1987). Treadway Report, USA.

·       NCD, Nederlands Centrum van Directeuren en Commissarissen (1994).NCD-visie inzake het commissariaat bij structuurvennootschapen, negen aanbevelingen, Badhoevendorp, the Netherlands (in Dutch).

·       NYSE (1997). NYSE Listed Company Manual, New York Stock Exchange, New York.

·       Ophof, H.P.J. (1994). Renovatie van het Structuurregime. In: Wildenberg, I.W. and Zwetsloot, F.J.M. (eds.). Naar een Nieuwe Machtsdeling in de Nederlandse Vennootschap: Over de Verhouding Tussen Aandeelhouders, Commissarissen, Directieleden en Werknemers in de Nederlandse Vennootschap. (in Dutch).

·       Pahl, R.E. and Winkler, J.T. (1974). The Economic Elite: Theory and Practice. In: Stanworth, P. and Giddens, A. (eds.), Elites and Power in British Society, Cambridge University Press, UK.

·       Pahn, P.H. (1998). Effective Corporate Governance in Singapore: Another Look. Singapore Management Review, 20:43-61.

·       Pape, J.C. (1998). Commercial Lending in Different Corporate Governance Systems, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Twente Press, Enschede, the Netherlands.

·       Parry, L.E. (1993). Book review of Stewardship by Peter Block (1993). Source unknown. Material is on file with the author of this study, 104-107.

·       Pearce, J.A.II, and Zahra, S.A. (1991). The relative power of CEOs and boards of directors: Associations with corporate performance, Strategic Management Journal, 12:135-153.

·       Pearce, J.A.II, and Zahra, S.A. (1992). Board composition from a strategic con­tingency perspective, Journal of Management Studies, 29:411-438.

·       Peasnell, K., Pope, P. and Young, S. (1998). A New Model, Accountancy, 122:91.

·       Perrow, C. (1986). Complex Organizations - A Critical Essay, Third edition, Random House, New York.

·       Peters, Commissie (1996). Corporate Governance in Nederland, Een Aanzet tot Verandering en een Uitnodiging tot Discussie, Amsterdam (in Dutch).

·       Peters, Commissie (1997a). Corporate Governance in Nederland, De Veertig Aanbevelingen, Amsterdam (in Dutch).

·       Peters, Commissie (1997b). Corporate Governance in The Netherlands, Forty Recommendations, Amsterdam.

·       Pettigrew, A.M. (1985a). The Awakening Giant: Continuity and Change in Imperial Chemical Industries, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

·       Pettigrew, A.M. (1985b). Contextualist Research: A Natural Way to Link Theory and Practice, In: Lawler et al. (eds.). Doing Research That Is Useful for Theory and Practice, Jossey-Bass Publishers, London.

·       Pettigrew, A.M. (1992a). On studying managerial elites, Strategic Management Journal, 13:163-182.

·       Pettigrew, A.M. (1992b). Boards of Directors, a Review of Recent Literature, Warwick Business School, UK.

·       Pettigrew, A.M. and McNulty, T. (1995). Power and Influence in and Around the Boardroom, Warwick Business School, UK.

·       Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Organization and its Environment, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17:218-228.

·       Pfeffer, J. (1973). Size, Composition and Function of Hospital Boards of Directors: A Study of Organization-Environment Linkage, Administrative Science Quar­terly, 18:349-364.

·       Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G.R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Re­source Dependence Perspective, Harper & Row, New York.

·       Pic, J. (1997). Europe’s Diverse Corporate Boards - How They Differ From Each Other & the U.S. In: Point of View, Spencer Stuart.

·       Pomeranz, F. (1998). Corporate governance: Opportunity for Institutions, Journal of Investing, 7:25-29.

·       Prenting, T.O. (1992). Co-Determination, Its Practices and Applicability to the U.S., SAM Advanced Management Journal, 57:12-16.

·       Price Waterhouse (1997a). Audit Committees. A Study in European Corporate Governance, Price Waterhouse/CEMS.

·       Price Waterhouse (1997b). Converging Cultures, Trends in European Corporate Governance, Price Waterhouse.

·       Ramaswamy, K., Thomas, A.S. and Litschert, R.J. (1994). Organizational Performance in a Regulated Environment, Strategic Management Journal, 15:63-74.

·       Rechner, P.L. (1989). Corporate Governance: Fact of Fiction? Business Horizon, July-August.

·       Rechner, P.L. and Dalton, D.R. (1991). CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis, Strategic Management Journal, 12:155-160.

·       Rediker, K.J. and Seth, A. (1995). Boards of Directors and Substitution Effects of Alternative Governance Mechanisms, Strategic Management Journal, 85-99.

·       Roe, M. (1994). Strong Managers, Weak Owners: The Political Roots of American Corporate Finance, Princeton University Press.

·       Rosen, L.S. (1995). Where Were The Directors, Review, Accounting Horizons, 9:149-152.

·       Rosenstein, S. and Wyatt J.G. (1990). Outside Directors, Board Independence and Shareholder Wealth, Journal of Financial Economics 26:175-191.

·       Rothuizen, W. (1996). If Corporate Governance Can’t Be Harmonised Within Europe, Neither Can the Role of the Auditor, De Accountant, 3:154-156.

·       Rubach, M.J. and Sebora, T.C. (1998). Comparative Corporate Governance: Competitive Implication of an Emerging Convergence, Journal of World Business. 33:167-184.

·       Russell Reynolds Associates (1998). Furthering the Global Dialogue on Corporate Governance, 1998 Institutional Survey of Institutional Investors, Russell Reynolds Associates.

·       Sadtler, D.R. (1993). Brief Case: The Role of Today's Board in Corporate Strat­egy, Long Range Planning, 26:112-113.

·       Samet, J.I and Sherman, J.A. (1984). The Audit Committee: In Search of a Purpose, The Corporation Law Review, 1:56-64.

·       Samuels, J.M., Greenfield, S. and Piper, A. (1996). The Role of Non-Executive Directors Post-Cadbury, Journal of General Management, 21:1-14.

·       Schellenger, M.H., Wood, D. and Tashakori, A. (1989). Board of Directors Composition, Shareholder Wealth and Dividend Policy, Journal of Management, 15:457-467.

·       Schilder, A. (1996). Het Peters-Rapport: Reactie van een Accountant, Maandblad voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie, 12:649-653.

·       Schurz, F.D. (1988). The British Boardroom: Time For a Revolution?, In: Strategic Planning: The Chief Executive and the Board, Bernard Taylor (ed.). First edition, 1:1, Oxford.

·       Seita, A.Y. (1997). Globalization and the Convergence of Values, Cornell International Law Journal, 30:429-491.

·       Selznick, A. (1966). TVA and the Grass Roots. 2nd edition. Berkeley: University of California Press (first published in 1949).

·       Sheridan, T. and Kendall, N. (1992). Corporate governance, an action plan for profitability and business success, Financial Times/Pitman Publishing, London.

·       Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1997). A Survey of Corporate Governance, The Journal of Finance, LII:737-783.

·       Short, H. (1996). Non-Executive Directors, Corporate Governance and the Cadbury Report: A Review of the Issues and EvidenceCorporate Governance: An International Review, 4:123-131.

·       Slagter, W.J. (1994). Institutional Investors and Corporate Governance in The Netherlands. In Baums,T., Buxbaum, R.M. and Hopt, K.J. (eds.). Institutional Investors and Corporate Governance, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 329-345.

·       Slagter, W.J. (1996). Compendium van het ondernemingsrecht. Kluwer, Deventer, the Netherlands.

·       Soderquist, L.D. and Sommer, A.A. Jr. (1990). Understanding Corporate Law, Practicing Law Institute, New York City, NY.

·       Spencer Stuart Executive Search (1987-1997). Board Index Series: a Research Project on Corporate Governance Practices in US. Spencer Stuart Executive Search: New York.

·       Spencer Stuart Executive Search (1996a-1997a). Board Index Series: a Research Project on Corporate Governance Practices in Belgium. Spencer Stuart Executive Search: Brussels.

·       Spencer Stuart Executive Search (1996b-1997b). Board Index Series: a Research Project on Corporate Governance Practices in Germany. Spencer Stuart Executive Search: Frankfurt.

·       Spencer Stuart Executive Search (1996c-1997c). Board Index Series: a Research Project on Corporate Governance Practices in Spain. Spencer Stuart Executive Search: Madrid.

·       Spencer Stuart Executive Search (1996d-1997d). Board Index Series: a Research Project on Corporate Governance Practices in Switzerland. Spencer Stuart Executive Search: Zurich.

·       Spencer Stuart Executive Search (1996e-1997e). Board Index Series: a Research Project on Corporate Governance Practices in Italy. Spencer Stuart Executive Search: Milan.

·       Spencer Stuart Executive Search (1996f-1997f). Board Index Series: a Research Project on Corporate Governance Practices in France. Spencer Stuart Executive Search: Paris.

·       Spencer Stuart Executive Search (1996g-1997g). Board Index Series: a Research Project on Corporate Governance Practices in England. Spencer Stuart Executive Search: London.

·       Spira, L.F. (1998). An Evolutionary Perspective on Audit Committee Effectiveness, Corporate Governance, An International Review, 1:29-38.

·       Steiner, G.A. (1988). The New Class of Chief Executive Officer, In: Strategic Planning: The Chief Executive and the Board, Bernard Taylor (ed.). First edition, 1:1, Oxford.

·       Stewart J., Schwab, S.J. and Thomas, R.S. (1998). Realigning corporate governance: Shareholder activism by labor unions, Michigan Law Review, 96: 1018-1094.

·       Stichting Communicatiekanaal Aandeelhouders – Shareholders’ Communication Channel (1998). Brochure on the introduction of a proxy solicitation system in the Netherlands, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

·       Stiles, P. and Taylor, B. (1993a). Benchmarking Corporate Governance: The Impact of the Cadbury Code, Long Range Planning, 26:61-71.

·       Stiles, P. and Taylor, B. (1993b). Benchmarking Corporate Governance: An Update, Long Range Planning, 26:138-139.

·       Sundaramurthy, C. and Lyon, D.W. (1998). Shareholder Governance Proposals and Conflict of Interests Between Inside and Outside Shareholders,Journal of Managerial Issues, 10:30-44.

·       Sundaramurthy, C., Rechner, P. and Wang, W. (1996). Governance Antecedents of Board Entrenchment: The Case of Classified Board Provisions, Journal of Management, 22:783-799.

·       Swedberg, Himmelstrand and Brukin (1990). In: S. Zuckin and P. DiMaggio, Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

·       Tabaksblat, M. (1995). Corporate Governance in Internationaal Perspectief, Naamlooze Vennootschap, 242-246 (in Dutch).

·       Thurman, L.G. (1990). The Board of Directors: An Explanatory Study of the Corporate Governance Process Behind Boardroom Doors, Doctoral dissertation, United States International University.

·       Todd DeZoort, F. (1997). An Investigation of Audit Committees’ Oversight Responsibilities, ABACUS, 2:208-227.

·       Toronto Stock Exchange (1994). Where Were the Directors? Guidelines for Improved Corporate Governance in Canada, Toronto.

·       Tricker, R.I. (1984). Corporate governance, practices, procedures and powers in British companies and their boards of directors, The Corporate Policy Group, Oxford.

·       Tricker, R.I. (1993). Editorial: Corporate Governance – The New Focus of Interest, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 1:1-4.

·       Tricker, R.I. (1994). International Corporate Governance, Text, Readings and Cases, Prentice Hall.

·       Van der Hoeven, B. (1995). Beschermingsconstructies van Nederlandse Beursfondsen: een burcht met vele verdedigingswallen, F&O, 4:35-41.

·       Vance, S.C. (1983). Corporate Leadership: Boards, Directors and Strategy. McGraw-Hill. New York.

·       Varallo, G.V. and Dreisbach, D.A. (1996a). Corporate Governance in the 1990s: New Challenges and Evolving Standards, American Bar Association.

·       Varallo, G.V. and Dreisbach, D.A. (1996b). Fundamentals of Corporate Governance - A Guide for Directors and Corporate Counsel. American Bar Association, Section of Business Law, Chicago.

·       VEB, Vereniging van Effectenbezitters (1997). Op Weg Naar Reële Zeggenschap, Reacties van de Vereniging van Effectenbezittersop het rapport van de Commissie Corporate Governance, ‘s-Gravenhage, the Netherlands (in Dutch).

·       VEB, Vereniging van Effectenbezitters (1998). Corporate Governance bij AEX-fondsen, Evaluatie en rating van de Corporate Governance-inspanningen van 25 AEX-fondsen, ‘s-Gravenhage, the Netherlands (in Dutch).

·       Vergoosen, R.G.A. and Muys-de Graaf, K.G. (1997). Corporate Governance en de Jaarverslaggeving van Beursgenoteerde Ondernemingen, De Accountant, 4:244-249 (in Dutch).

·       Verschoor, C.C. (1993). Benchmarking the Audit Committee, Heightened Public Expectations for Greater Corporate Accountability are Focusing on the Audit Committee, Journal of Accountancy, September: 59-64.

·       Vicknair, D., Hickman, K. and Carnes, K.C. (1993). A Note on Audit Committee Independence: Evidence from the NYSE on “GREY” Area Directors, Accounting Horizons, 7:53-57.

·       Viénot, M. (1995). The Board of Directors of Listed Companies in France, Report of the “Viénot Committee”, Paris.

·       Wallage, Ph. (1995). Corporate Governance en de Rol en Functie van de Accountant, De Naamlooze Vennootschap, 12:274-279 (in Dutch).

·       Walsh, J.P. and Seward, J.K. (1990). On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanisms, Academy of Management Review, 15:421-458.

·       Wang, J. (1991). Outside Director Composition and Corporate Performance, Doctoral dissertation, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville.

·       Wang, J., Dewhirst, H. and Dudley (1992). Boards of Directors and Stakeholder Orientation, Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 115-123.

·       Weimer, J. (1998). Reacties van AEX-Fondsen op de Aanbevelingen van de Commissie Corporate Governance, Maandblad voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie, 618-629 (in Dutch).

·       Weisbach, M. (1988). Outside Directors and CEO Turnover, Journal of Financial Economics, 20:431-460.

·       Whittington, G. (1993). Corporate Governance and the Regulation of Financial Reporting, Accounting and Business Research, 91A:311-319.

·       Williams, H.M. and Shapiro, I.S. (1979). Power and Accountability, The Changing Role of the Corporate Board of Directors, Carnegie-Mellon University Press.

·       Williamson, O.E. (1985). The Economics Institutions of Capitalism, The Free Press, New York.

·       Yoshimori, M. (1995). Whose company is it? The concept of the corporation in Japan and the West, Long Range Planning, 28:33-45.

·       Zahra, S.A. (1990). Increasing the board's involvement in strategy, Long Range Planning, 23:109-117.

·       Zahra, S.A. and Pearce, J.A. II. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative Model, Journal of Management, 15:291-334.

·       Zajac, E.J. and Westphal, J.D. (1994). The costs and benefits of managerial incentives and monitoring in large U.S. companies: When is more not better?, Strategic Management Journal, 15:121-142.

·       Zald, M.N. (1969). The Power and Functions of Boards: A Theoretical Synthesis, American Journal of Sociology, 97-111.

 


Related news items:

 
You may also be interested in these articles:

    PDF Download

    Interested in the PDF version of the study? Click here to download.

    Maassen, G.F. (2002). An International Comparison of Corporate Governance Models. A Study on the Formal Independence and Convergence of One-Tier and Two-Tier Corporate Boards of Directors in the United States of America, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands.

    Maassen, G.F. (2002). An International Comparison of Corporate Governance Models. A Study on the Formal Independence and Convergence of One-Tier and Two-Tier Corporate Boards of Directors in the United States of America, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Spencer Stuart Executive Search.